AI text to video generator

[Lawrence]

Has anyone used an AI application to generate a wetting video? Can anyone recommend an app that allows this type of content?

[wetpantsboy]

Grok is the only one that generates anything for me. If I ask Gemini or ChatGPT they say they cannot make sexual content. Even if I argue that peeing isn't sexual or try to ask for just a wet spot from sitting in a puddle, they claim that the location of the wet spot could be seen as sexual. Grok doesn't care and will make videos and photos of wetting either from scratch or modify and existing photo. The quality is pretty poor however.

[Lawrence]

I have just begun experimenting with a platform called sendfame. I have zero prior experience with this kind of creative work. I have used AI chat, but I have never before tried to create a video.

And the results are rather intriguing.

It's not free, but it's not terribly expensive. I encountered no guardrails. The site claims it is "uncensored." I am located in the USA. I had to register an account with an e-mail address, and I paid using a credit card that is associated with my real name. I did not have to do any type of age verification. (Other than the fact that in the USA, you generally cannot get a credit card if you are under age 18.)

Have a look:

https://w-si.link/1zNorkVQ5z2780tMD

[misticsno]

You can also try grok. It has some guards, but i have had some fun result 1ad82fbc-026d-4ca2-8368-ec964399982e.png
The trick is generate a image in imagine, and then generate video form image

[white_cream]

I've had some success with Gemini, it's like roulette to see if it'll generate it or not. SeaArt and Tensor used to be good using some of the LORAs but they cleaned up their sites a month or two back, so that's gone by-the-by. Haven't had to shell out for a service just yet, so as a result I haven't really been able to generate anything SUPERB... just things suitable for my own enjoyment.

[Lawrence]

I have been spending waaaaay too much time playing with the paid version of Grok ($30/month, cancel at any time). I get very good results creating images from text. Not modifying photos of real people or other images that I found on the internet. Just creating images out of nothing but natural language text prompts.

Video is far more difficult. In general, Grok appears to be very good at creating video from a single image. But there's tons of guardrails. Working around them is possible. But almost every video I have created, even once I figure out how to bypass the censorship, has something fundamentally wrong that I haven't been able to correct. The most common problem is that the wetness appears as a dark red liquid, or white creamy liquid, or... something else that is not pee. But if you use the words pee, piss or urine, you get blocked.

Another problem is that I can't get the wetness in the right place with the right pattern. Not in a video, anyway. In images, it takes a lot work, and I can't always get it right, but I've had some moderately good results. Like this one:

test_03.jpg

I'll post more when I have time. Feedback and comments are welcome. Other contributions from AI are also welcome.

[Juliered]

I've also tested AI a lot, and I'm impressed by your image! It's really great, and what's more, it's the location and situation I like the most!!! Personally, I can only use Grok to create magnificent stories or challenges.

[Lawrence]

I've also tested AI a lot, and I'm impressed by your image! It's really great, and what's more, it's the location and situation I like the most!!! Personally, I can only use Grok to create magnificent stories or challenges.

Apparently, I did not save this image properly on Grok; I saved it to my PC. So I don't have a record of the complete text of the prompts. But it started with something like this:

18 year old woman with long blonde hair sitting in a classroom taking a test. She is wearing blue jeans and a gray tee shirt. She has a worried look on her face.

I have experimented a bit with worried, anxious, and nervous. This was the easy part. From there, I used additional prompts to add the wet spot. That part was more complicated, and unfortunately I don't remember exactly what I wrote.

I am not trying to create underage stuff. I avoided using the words student and school. The concept that I was working with was a postsecondary setting. You might get good stuff using phrases like 24-year old female college student. But that's not what I did here.

But even if I had a record of exactly what prompts I used, you would almost certainly get different results. Even within my account, I would probably get different results if I use the same prompts again. That's how these LLMs work. The body of information they are referencing is constantly changing.