AI-generated photo and video

[Lawrence]

I am starting a new thread for this with a more descriptive title. Those who have no interest in AI-generated content may choose to skip it. But if you are a skeptic, or you have been disappointed after viewing some really bad and stupid AI depictions of our fetish, I encourage you to keep an open mind. Good results take a lot of work and a lot iterations. I am a raw beginner. I signed up for SuperGrok a few days ago. I've spent way too many hours playing around the last few days. But before this, I had absolutely zero experience with AI generation of images and video--and only the most rudimentary experience with using a chatbot.

An my naive, poorly educated opinion is that I have generated some pretty amazing stuff. Many, many viewers may recognize the videos as AI-generated. Inexperienced, naive viewers may not. Nevertheless, for something created out of thin air, the stuff I am getting is very intriguing.

I plan to add a couple images and videos to this post later today.

I would love to hear from others who have experimented with image and video generation, and I would love to see other results. I would like to share tips on what kind of prompts work.

My focus will always be on genuine accidents and genuine desperation. But this general topic is interesting enough to me that I encourage others to post ideas, comments, and images and videos of other things that are relevant to our fetish. In other words, I am not trying to limit the scope of this thread to genuine accidents and genuine desperation. If what you're into is intentional wetting, or squatting with a visible stream, or really anything germane to this forum, and you have something to contribute related to AI, then do so here in this thread.

Good, relevant discussion of AI-generated content should be welcome here even if it would normally belong in a different section. If you have something interesting to say about AI-generated content, you can say it here, even if it is about diapers or bedwetting or whatever.

If the site owner or moderators feel that this is a problem, I think we'll hear from them.

With that being said, I strongly recommend that if you want to share AI-generated scat images, then please use a link to a file upload service like WeSendIt or Sendspace, and please do not post the image here in this thread. And tell us in your post that the link is to a scat image. My kink is not your kink, and I totally respect all varieties of this fetish. But the simple fact is that a lot of people into wetting really don't want to see scat. We should avoid posting such images here. It will drive many people away from this thread.

I plan to add a couple images and videos to this thread later today.

Lawrence

[Lawrence]

Here is a first look at images and video that I have generated with Grok. No wetting. The objective here is realistic desperation. And I figured out the audio function LOL


rhmc_5808_01.pngrhmc_5808_02.pngrhmc_5808_03.png



Have a look at the videos:

https://w-si.link/nv6Lordw0HTZbwCaF

[aqua 2021]

The vid is great, quite realistic...good job! And next, 'Oh shit, I'm wetting my pants, I can't stop it'??? thanks

[Lawrence]

The vid is great, quite realistic...good job! And next, 'Oh shit, I'm wetting my pants, I can't stop it'??? thanks

Thank you for the feedback.

Generating a realistic wetting in a video is extremely difficult. I have a few alpha outputs, and I may share some of it soon. But I have found it impossible to get realistic video of a wetting in action, i.e., video that actually shows fabric that is dry at the beginning, and then a wet spot appears and grows larger.

Still photo images of a wet spot are possible, but it takes a lot of work to get it in the right place and make it look anything like the real thing.

I do plan to add a few images and vids later this evening.

[aqua 2021]

What AI generator are you using....I've played with a lot of stills not vids (posted some elsewhere here), but very curious about vids....thanks.

[aqua 2021]

Three examples of what I've created....all stills.

[Lawrence]

What AI generator are you using....I've played with a lot of stills not vids (posted some elsewhere here), but very curious about vids....thanks.

The stuff I have posted is from the paid consumer version of Grok, called SuperGrok. It's $30/month in the US. And that is where I am spending my time right now.

I have tried a few things with a program called SendFame. But it's more expensive. You pay for every image and video. The program uses tokens. Not crypto. You buy tokens with a regular credit card. Images are relatively cheap; vids are not. You pay when you click to generate. If you don't like the result, too bad. The advantage is there are basically no guardrails except blocking images of minors. One weird thing that did happen a couple times is that SendFame genrerated a still image of a woman, and then when I tried to edit the image or turn it into video, it blocked it, saying it was underage. So, not perfect. But nowhere near the restrictions you encounter with Grok.

That said, Grok has a "spicy" mode for video generation that lifts many of the restrictions. But the technology is very, very imperfect. If you engage the spicy mode, then it does weird shit that you don't ask for, like a topless girl riding a bus LOL And it's hard to get rid of that stuff. But if you turn off the spicy mode, then a lot of other stuff you want to do gets blocked.

But I've gotten some pretty good stuff from Grok. Getting ready to upload more now.

Your vids are interesting. I have not had much luck, and I have not spent a lot time trying, to generate images of a standing accident. I have been working mainly with girls who are sitting. I did manage to get this, though:

4993_metro.jpg

But that's not the pattern of wetness you get when someone wets their pants while they are standing. Getting anything that looks like real pee running down her legs--with a pattern and liquid behavior that looks real--is beyond my reach right now LOL.

And I can't get the program to understand that I want sweatpants that are open at the bottom and not elastic cuffs. LOL I think cuffed sweatpants look ridiculous with bare feet.

And with many hours of work and multiple iterations of the same video, I've gotten some damn good realistic-looking videos of girls sitting on airplanes. But the program really doesn't understand commercial passenger aircraft. It puts seats facing the wrong way. It puts flight attendants standing between the wall of the aircraft and a passenger seat while standing and talking to the passenger in the seat. (The flight attendant should be standing in the aisle.) It's just taking images from airplanes and putting them together, with no information about how they fit together.

Grok is doing a good job of generating some images and videos that bring some of my fantasies to life. And right now, I'm happy to pay $30/month for it.

But anyone who thinks this stuff is going to change the world in the near future just doesn't understand what these things are. And relying on them for anything really important without independent fact-checking and human intervention is just flat-out dangerous.

Elon Musk ought to be fucking deported to Mars. But I'll pay $30/month for his program for a while, just to see what it can do.

[Lawrence]

Here's a few more images.

And a link to a few videos that were generated from the images:

https://w-si.link/WxPFYbZy0f8S7ftIj

It is virtually impossible to duplicate these kinds of results. With this type of AI, you get something different every time. Even with the same prompts. It does appear that Grok is learning my preferences.

0046_airplane.jpg0048_airplane.jpg00400_airplane.jpg

[Lawrence]

So, if you are an occasional, infrequent bedwetter...

and you fall asleep on an airplane...

and you didn't think to wear protection...


img_7004.jpg

Check out the vids to see what happens when you wake up:

https://w-si.link/Sb3sZ3GIYkqI8FUWC

[aqua 2021]

Just a quick note; these are I think really, really good (the vids, stills too). I get how LLM works re non repetitions, etc. Your results on Grok are better than mine using Perchance (free, unlimited, stills only). And it sounds like the results come after a lot of hours, not sure I have that much time but may give Grok a shot, at least for stills....love to see more of what you create...and love the wettings on airplanes...always a fantasy of mine (with one wetting I witnessed and a few more women told me about....). More later.

[11vvb]

I wish The Fearless Lohengrin could make it to these days.

[Lawrence]

I wish The Fearless Lohengrin could make it to these days.

I remember that guy

He was quite gifted at manipulating photos. By today's standards, it may seem a little primitive, or obviously fake. But back then, it was good stuff.

I am reluctant to fool around with modifying images of real people--especially celebrities or public figures--but even just random photos, because of all the concerns around deepfake images, and the potential for criminal or civil liability. With that being said, people have been altering photos for a century or more. Before there were digital cameras and Adobe Photoshop, there was a thing called "trick photography" that involved combining images using darkroom photography. I never did it. But there were ways you could combine images from multiple photos into one photo using techniques in the darkroom while developing black-and-white film. So, for example, you could put two people in the same room together, even though that never happened.

I did create one modified image using AI, just to see how easy or difficult it would be. I don't remember whether I used Grok or Sendfame.

Here is the lovely actress and singer Zendaya:

87006_Original.jpg



87007_Altered.jpg

[aqua 2021]

Ah, famous people wetting their jeans...

[Lawrence]

I am not sure if I can get a decent video from this one or not. When I get close to what I want in the video, something goes wrong LOL and it puts dialog in the wrong girl's mouth, or changes an angle so that something just doesn't work anymore, or something else. But the images are pretty good.



snapshot_01.jpgsnapshot_03.jpgsnapshot_02.jpg

[Lawrence]

Wet herself on a long bus trip.

Link to the video:

https://w-si.link/8KHvmdZx1HvU4dyBS

001_gsmc.jpg


002_gsmc.jpg