RIP Patches Place

[Lloyd_R1]

The "squirting" I've seen in every porn movie, and on every cam site, has been peeing, without exception. That's why I said "hypocrisy".

I have one question for those of you who think women "ejaculate" fluid 6 feet into the air: If that fluid is not coming form the bladder, where is it coming from?

I'll believe in female ejaculation when I see it, feel it, hear it, smell it, and taste it. Until then, it's pee. And I have no problem with that.

I believe that there is genuine female ejaculation. I do not believe that it can shoot 6 feet into the air. There is no female equivalent of the seminal vesicle, so this is clearly urine, from a bladder responding to the orgasmic contractions by rhythmicly releasing pulses of it. But because of the mystique of squirting, it's allowed, as long as people can convince themselves it's ejaculate...

[Peevert]

I hope there's genuine female ejaculation, I'd like to experience it. I just know that what I see in porn is clearly pee.

because of the mystique of squirting, it's allowed, as long as people can convince themselves it's ejaculate...

Well said. I love telling these guys on cam sites it's pee. Gets them all defensive. But to me, anything that helps expose the hypocrisy is worth it.

[Lloyd_R1]

I hope there's genuine female ejaculation, I'd like to experience it. I just know that what I see in porn is clearly pee.

Well said. I love telling these guys on cam sites it's pee. Gets them all defensive. But to me, anything that helps expose the hypocrisy is worth it.

What amazes me is the power of belief (or perhaps suspension of disbelief) that allows people to think it's female ejaculation. I've seen female ejaculation. As you would expect, it's less spectacular than male ejaculation. A very small amount of fluid is released. It's not urine. But it's certainly not enough to squirt 6 feet. Guys that believe it's real are fooling themselves, and just not thinking logically. Well, then they're thinking with their "other head", so no surprise there...

[Lawrence]

About the only sales and distribution model that the credit card companies have not clamped down on is the C4S model. We don't know why they let this distribution method stand but they do. However, the C4S does not work when you want to sell DVDs and Blu-rays.

I'm gonna take an educated guess on this one.

When the vendor ships a physical product, the vendor, and by extension, the financial institution, can become subject to the jurisdiction of many, many authorities that simply cannot reach them if the product is purely digital.

In other words, if the product lives on a server somewhere in eastern Europe, and the buyer, who gets a digital download, is in Australia... yes, you can certainly follow the money back to its final destination, which may be a bank account in Canada, or the US, or the UK. But if the product, which could be alleged to violate local obscenity laws, is physically shipped from California to Australia, the whole case gets a lot more interesting very quickly...

I am certainly not defending the tactics of the payment processors. But I can see where there is a huge difference in the scope of jurisdiction once you have porn on a DVD that is getting shipped across state lines and across international borders.

LM

[Peevert]

I'm gonna take an educated guess on this one.

There is some logic in that. When Max Hardcore got busted for his pee videos, it was because he shipped a video by US Mail to a postal inspector near Orlando, where pee videos are illegal according to "community standards". I think he did 2 or 3 years in federal prison for a pee video. Yet another victim of George Bush's presidency (as we all are), but if the Democrats don't come up with a stronger candidate than Hillary Clinton, we may well be facing these type of witch hunts again soon. Anyway, the point being, that had he "shipped" his pee video digitally over the internet, there would have no grounds for the postal inspector to get his fascist ass involved in this, and no violation of "community standards" (the Supreme Court litmus test of obscenity), since the Internet has no "community standards".

So, yes, there may be some paranoia on the part of credit card companies regarding physical products, although one has ever been prosecuted, so it does not excuse their behavior.

[DeltaFoxtrot]

Vote Libertarian. Get the government out of your wallet and out of your bedroom.

[Dusty Harold]

A Solution

Then again we could all vote a computer to run our government logically & Fair . Then the 2 party system we now have in place . That are full of Liars , Cheaters & Skirt Chasers instead to run things right . Along with staying out of all of our pockets & invading what we all do behind closed doors . Which is None of THEIR Business at all

Dusty Haqrold

[Peevert]

Vote Libertarian. Get the government out of your wallet and out of your bedroom.

Voting third party is a great theory, but the Libertarians are hardly the answer, they just want big business to run the country, they're Republicans in drag.

[moosehead68]

A libertarian is a person who wants to take from society without giving back.

[Patches]

Please stay on topic

This discussion thread is starting to get off topic. Please keep future comments relevant to the subject. Comments about government actions are okay but generalizations about political parties are not connected to the subject.

[Peevert]

Okay, that's valid. I think we can agree on one thing, regardless of our political differences: Max Hardcore shouldn't have done time for a pee video.