Ger's Female Desperation site

[Paul Tester]

Oh dear! This site, one of the originals and used to be one of the best, has become a pre-view site for Skymouse. Look at the current new page; 19 out of 30 pictures are Skymouse. No desperation, just professional models paid to piss in their knickers. They do not even try, or not very hard, to look s if they are desperate and only pissing themselves because they can't control their bladder. More likely they are thinking of the pay-cheque to come.

[bwetfan]

Though some people do a great job of finding the personal stuff online (e.g. Aloo), I think that the zenith of pee shots was back in the webshots era. Once the other services took over (with a lot more security features), it seemed like the quality of the pee shots took a nose dive.

I think that Char and Ger's site was at its best when they were screening for the best webshots. I was never a fan of their watermarking what were clearly amateur shots from elsewhere, but I suppose they had their reasons for doing that.

[PottyDance]

Oh dear! This site, one of the originals and used to be one of the best, has become a pre-view site for Skymouse. Look at the current new page; 19 out of 30 pictures are Skymouse. No desperation, just professional models paid to piss in their knickers. They do not even try, or not very hard, to look s if they are desperate and only pissing themselves because they can't control their bladder. More likely they are thinking of the pay-cheque to come.

A few years ago the site went dormant when they traveled to Ger's wife's hometown for a family visit. Hopefully they are on a summer vacation, and the pictures will come more frequently.

[PottyDance]

Though some people do a great job of finding the personal stuff online (e.g. Aloo), I think that the zenith of pee shots was back in the webshots era. Once the other services took over (with a lot more security features), it seemed like the quality of the pee shots took a nose dive.

I think that Char and Ger's site was at its best when they were screening for the best webshots. I was never a fan of their watermarking what were clearly amateur shots from elsewhere, but I suppose they had their reasons for doing that.

Webshots was the zenith of still photo wettings and pop-a-squats. I think the drop off in still and video content is from a number of factors.

- People are more aware the hilarious picture their friend took of them peeing at the rock concert can easily be dispersed electronically.

- I've noticed at outdoor events people are much more careful about public peeing than they were ten years ago. People now assume a cell phones and security cam is watching.

- The newer social media venues (like vine) censors more aggressively.

- Google-Youtube results are also more aggressively censored.

- Flickr has fallen off a cliff since they sold out to yahoo.

- Google/Youtube search tools are clumsy compared to five years ago too.

Example... a search for "peeing" often displays video's that have no "peeing" in the description. If a video has the word "funny" it will come up in the search results because a another video in the Related Videos frame on the right has the words "funny" and "peeing" in the description.

It does the same with negative operators like the minus sign too. If I try negative operators like -herman or -prank or -gamer it wipes out virtually all results.

The Boolean Operators don't function as well either.

- Google image search is darn near useless. Remember how good altavista's worked?

- Vine will say "26,000 results for "peeing", but now cuts displayed results after about two pages.

Ironically all the censorship of citizen generated content has resulted in hard porno dominating pee searches. The more tasteful self made pictures and videos seem to be buried.

[dirk1961]

Oh Paul, doesn`t it mean that there are 30-19=11 other ("normal") pictures ?
THe opposite is to wait until they have enough "normal" pictures. For me it is okay to get "only" some pictures. Let them fill up the page with professional pics. They are not so bad sometimes ...
Stay wet, Dirk

Oh dear! This site, one of the originals and used to be one of the best, has become a pre-view site for Skymouse. Look at the current new page; 19 out of 30 pictures are Skymouse. No desperation, just professional models paid to piss in their knickers. They do not even try, or not very hard, to look s if they are desperate and only pissing themselves because they can't control their bladder. More likely they are thinking of the pay-cheque to come.

[Peedancer]

Like others say, content is probably harder to find and if SM helps keep the site running I dont mind their pictures.
Would love to know the story about the 26th picture on there.

[Aloo]

Like others say, content is probably harder to find and if SM helps keep the site running I dont mind their pictures.
Would love to know the story about the 26th picture on there.

This was the original source, but no background to the incident is given.

https://twitter.com/rickyig/status/597185947927609344

My opinion, for what it's worth, is that Shara and Ger's site is a classic, and from time to time they do post some good new pics that I haven't come across before. Pic 25 on the new page is a wonderful example, girls who piss the bed when they get drunk are my absolute favourite.

If a few Skymouse images thrown into the bundle is the price we have to pay for such a service, then I'm more than happy to see them too.

Aloo

[Adrian6970]

Oh dear! This site, one of the originals and used to be one of the best, has become a pre-view site for Skymouse. Look at the current new page; 19 out of 30 pictures are Skymouse. No desperation, just professional models paid to piss in their knickers. They do not even try, or not very hard, to look s if they are desperate and only pissing themselves because they can't control their bladder. More likely they are thinking of the pay-cheque to come.

I know what you mean, Paul. The site isn't what it used to be. Also there was an announcement some time ago that they wouldn't be accepting any new stories which is a pity as I rather liked the story section.

[AquaVitae]

Hold on. Google and Twitter are EXCELLENT resources for searching, you just need to know how. I have caught many of the pics Shara and Ger and even Aloo find well before they are posted because I search Twitter. You can too. Here, use this:

herself "pic.twitter.com" peed OR pee OR pee'd OR peeing OR peeed OR peeeed OR pees OR pee's OR piss OR pissing OR pissed OR pissin OR pisses OR peein OR wets OR wetting

You don't need to include AND, just putting words together without quotes implies the AND. Otgherwise, use quotes. In the Twitter search above, I only get results that include pictures. I also included some common combinations of phrases. You can do the same thing in Google.

I use the above as my skeleton. To get more results, I replace the "herself" with "her pants." Or I might replace the "pic.twitter.com" with "instagram.com" or "vine.co."

On Google, you can aim searches at specific sites. You just type "site:experienceproject.com" or whatever website followed by the search string.

[Paul Tester]

Bing

I find that Bing Image or Video search, with safe search off, will give as many peeing, or holding images as Ger does.
I am not against Skymouse per se, I just prefer to see picts, posed or otherwise of women not peeing, or trying not to pee. S-M models look as if they are enjoying it too.
Ger was a classic and one of the best; is it a fact of life that all the sites only get worse and then fade away, like Patches, Thomas's. etc......

[PottyDance]

Hold on. Google and Twitter are EXCELLENT resources for searching, you just need to know how. I have caught many of the pics Shara and Ger and even Aloo find well before they are posted because I search Twitter. You can too. Here, use this:

herself "pic.twitter.com" peed OR pee OR pee'd OR peeing OR peeed OR peeeed OR pees OR pee's OR piss OR pissing OR pissed OR pissin OR pisses OR peein OR wets OR wetting

You don't need to include AND, just putting words together without quotes implies the AND. Otgherwise, use quotes. In the Twitter search above, I only get results that include pictures. I also included some common combinations of phrases. You can do the same thing in Google.

I use the above as my skeleton. To get more results, I replace the "herself" with "her pants." Or I might replace the "pic.twitter.com" with "instagram.com" or "vine.co."

On Google, you can aim searches at specific sites. You just type "site:experienceproject.com" or whatever website followed by the search string.

AquaVitae, thank you very much for the search tips. Its great to get help from one of the mainstays.

In general, yes. You can still find alot with google. But the results have changed in just the last few years.

I've been doing most of those search techniques for 15 years, including site: and other strings and wildcards using OR, like OR pee OR pee'd OR peeing OR peeed OR peeeed and so on.

Years ago I customized google search strings using OR into language groups. I have a library of pee related search strings using OR in different languages. They work well during times of outdoor festivals (German during Oktoberfest, Portugese during Canival, multiple languages during Roskilde, etc.). I even cut-n-paste (or highlight and search) Japanese characters. Amazing results.

I understand blank spaces between search words defaults to AND logic. Google (for whatever reason) now sometimes ignores AND operators.

Unfortunately google changed. For example, Google used to confine results from site:youtube.com pee to videos with pee or peeing in the description, title or comments. Good. Now google displays videos with pee or peeing in the "Up Next" section too... even if they don't have pee or peeing in the description, title or comments. This swamps me with results that have nothing to do with peeing. Same number of needles, bigger haystack.

And the minus operator is now sensitive to the "Up Next" section too. For example site:youtube.com pee -prank filtered out videos with the word "prank" in the title and description. That's good. Better to look for needles in smaller haystacks.

But starting a few years ago, site:youtube.com pee -prank started filtering out videos that didn't have the word "prank." Why? Because the word "prank" was in one of the videos in the Up Next column. That wipes out alot of desired video results. It still shrunk the haystack (good) but now eliminates the needle too (bad).

This isn't to say my skills don't need refreshing. What was cutting edge 10-15 years ago might not work now. While one door closes, google may have opened another door everyone else already knows about, but I have yet to discover. Its easy to get stale. Your search tips are always welcome.

[inyourpants]

Oh dear! This site, one of the originals and used to be one of the best, has become a pre-view site for Skymouse. Look at the current new page; 19 out of 30 pictures are Skymouse. No desperation, just professional models paid to piss in their knickers. They do not even try, or not very hard, to look s if they are desperate and only pissing themselves because they can't control their bladder. More likely they are thinking of the pay-cheque to come.

I think today's update answers that....

[Paul Tester]

The title of the site used to say it all. Female Desperation; to me that means females in desperate need of a pee and taking actions to prevent any release until they are in a suitable place. That is, holding back their pee, either by a hand between their legs or other ways.
The latest update has one picture with a female pressing between her legs, and not very convincingly at that. Site should be re-named "Female Urination."
Skymouse models could at least try to look as if they are desperately trying not to pee in their knickers. Bound to Burst models can manage that better, as could Giga models.

[Lloyd_R1]

I have to agree in principle with this post. I actually like the wetting, and I don't think that fits with the "desperation" thing it's supposed to be about.

I have other criticisms also - the fact that half the supposed "winks" are clearly real wettings, put there because someone wrote something like "jk" or "it's only water". The fact that some of the supposed real wettings are clearly fake or winks. But yes, over all, the whole desperation thing isn't really right with the wetting pics.

I personally like deliberate wetting anyhow, so the idea that they fake any sort of "desperation" before peeing profusely just doesn't cut it for me. I'd much rather they just smile at the camera, stand with their legs apart, pull their jeans up tight provocatively into their crotches, smile at the camera and cut loose a torrent that we know they've been saving up for the shoot.

Perhaps there should be separate picture galleries, one for desperation, one for wetting, and the wetting one should be broken up into deliberate, candid and staged.

Or we just keep on sorting through the postings finding the ones we like.

[inyourpants]

Personally, I look at the pics on offer, click the ones that look interesting, and if even only one or two of them are what I consider to be good I'm happy.